This is a concrete poem. It is about Hermes. Can you feel my sarcasm dripping through the writing? I am tired, and explaining these poems are very hard to do. I only really studied Greek mythology in grade 7; I’m having to often refer to websites and figure out the “real meaning” behind these more abstract poems than the obvious hymns. Anyway, Hermes is the god of travel, hospitals, and the likes. The first stanza refers to, potentially, the magic staff (also known as the “Caduceus”) that he closes and opens the eyes of mortals.
Makes no sense? Well, Hermes is basically Zeus’s right-hand man. Dreams (to the morals) are sent by Zeus, and Hermes “conducts” them. He, in this sense, is described as the god who had it in his power to send refreshing sleep to mortals, or take it away, seeing as how REM sleep (deep sleep, the kind that is refreshing) is usually with dreams, leading into the second stanza.
The second stanza refers to the dreams that come to this poet, on behalf of what she believes to be due to Hermes. She doesn't ask for these dreams, but they come, and she is thankful (in the last line, her enjoyment is what I consider as a form of appreciation). "old voices / old messages" (11-12) refers back to what I believe is the age of Greek mythology, in which they are now delivered to her in present time - due to Hermes.
On a completely unrelated note, the two serpents on his magical staff have a strange Greek myth as to how it came into Hermes’s possession. There is a story about Tiresias (a blind prophet), who found two snakes copulating, in which Tiresias then killed the female snake with his staff. Immediately after, Tiresias was turned into a woman, and remained so until he repeated the same act with the male snake seven years later. Later, this staff fell into the possession of Hermes (through Apollo as an act of friendship), in which the staff now has transformative powers. Interesting, huh?
Anyway, so this is a concrete poem, where the appearance contributes to the meaning. This poet’s placement of words all has meaning, to show emphasis like lines 11 and 12. Without having seen the poem, just hearing it would only be half the magic. With no rhyme scheme, this falls under free verse; it does resemble the “cadence of speech” (Mrs. Patrick’s notes on free verse), hence the breaking of lines for emphasis. It would just as we would say it, especially with no strict rhyme scheme. But it doesn’t resemble a paragraph, hence it mainly being under the category of a concrete poem.
The second stanza is filled with imagery, with words such as “wild and knowing” (8) which gives me a sense of a free spirit. I love the second stanza especially.